120405 Countdown
120108 Donofrio spanks MSNBC Pete Williams
112608 New request to SOTUS on behalf of Cort Wrotnowski
112508 Polarik and why the Birth Certificate that was posted on Factcheck.org, FTS, Kos is bogus.
If this video is removed from YouTube, visit:
http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=371
UPDATE From prez elect mouthpiece on the birth certificate…
Q Good. The CEO of WorldNetDaily has called on the President-elect to release a birth certificate listing the hospital and names of parents. The White House believes that this would fully satisfy the constitutional requirement, don’t you?
MR. FRATTO: I don’t think I have anything to say on that, Lester, and I think we’re going to end it right there.
Thank you.
The question came from Lester Kinsolving. Since we have all heard the recent news that the Kenyan Ambassador “confirmed” to a radio host that Obama was born in Kenya.
LISTEN HERE Kenya Ambassador on Obama Birth. See minute: 12:39
CONTACT INFO:
Contact Mike Clark, WRIF Michigan Radio Talk Show Host: mim@wrif.com
Contact Your Congressional Representatives with quick phone call and ask
- 1) that Obama be investigated to insure he is a natural born citizen eligible to be President
2) ask for Congressional Hearings on this immediately.
Senate switchboard: 202-224-3121. Contact your Representative by e-mail. House switchboard: 202-225-3121 … White House switchboard: 202-456-1414 …
FREE NUMBERS TO CALL 1-800-828-0498 or
1-866-220-0044
www.cbn.com/CBNnews/politics/contact_congress.aspx
| US Supreme Court case > JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGED BY LEO DONOFRIO IN NJ APPELLATE DIVISION – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE |
| Posted: Nov.21.2008 @ 6:53 pm | Lasted edited: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm |
| JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGED BY LEO DONOFRIO IN NJ SUPERIOR COURT APPELLATE DIVISION – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ALLEGED AGAINST JUDGE JACK M. SABATINO IN ACTION CHALLENGING ELIGIBILITY OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR 2008 ELECTION. [MEDIA UPDATE:] Today, Leo Donofrio learned that New Jersey Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino has failed to correct the public record of the initial lower court case. Leo Donofrio feels it is imperative that he bring this battle public. Therefore, he will appear on the Plains Radio Network with Ed Hale tonight at 9:00 PM EST. Leo Donofrio will also appear on Overnight AM with Lan Lamphere at 11:00 PM EST as well. |
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS SCHEDULED FOR FULL CONFERENCE, LEO DONOFRIO’S NJ CITIZEN SUIT CHALLENGING THE ELIGIBILITY OF MULTIPLE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CANDIDATES, INCLUDING BARACK OBAMA.
Today, the United States Supreme Court scheduled the case – Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey - US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407 – for a conference of the nine Justices. The conference is a completely private affair and the public may not attend. If four of the nine Justices vote to hear the case in full, oral argument may be scheduled. The conference is scheduled for December 5, 2008, ten days before the meeting of the Electoral College.
On Nov. 19, the case was docketed for full conference of all nine Justices and scheduled for December 5, 2008.
It is not known at this time the exact details of how the case came to be “DISTRIBUTED for Conference”. This blog will be updated as details emerge.
Below is an update on the Leo C. Donofrio NJ lawsuit that states that Obama is ineligible to be president. The lawsuit is currently appealed before the US Supreme Court:
“Applicant, Leo C. Donofrio, submitted a renewed application for emergency stay of the ‘08 national election to The Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas on Nov. 14, 2008 by US Postal Express Mail which was delivered at 7:46 AM, Nov. 17, 2008.
The renewed application hit the US Supreme Court on-line docket search engine sometime between noon and 2:15 PM today, Nov. 18, 2008.
111708
***LEO DONOFRIO OFFICIALLY RENEWS EMERGENCY STAY APPLICATION CHALLENGING 2008 ELECTION – EMERGENCY STAY APPLICATION RENEWED TO JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS – SUBMITTED AT 7:46 AM, NOV. 17, 2008***
Upcoming Radio interview with Leo Donofrio Leo Donofrio will be interviewed on Plains Radio tonight at 9:00 PM EST.
111408 1:20pm
LEO C. DONOFRIO WILL RENEW HIS APPLICATION FOR AN EMERGENCY STAY OF THE 2008 NATIONAL ELECTION ON MONDAY, NOV. 17 BY WAY OF SUPREME COURT RULE 22.4 – LETTER TO WILLIAM K. SUTER, CLERK OF THE US SUPREME COURT.
[Today, I, Leo C. Donofrio, paid $186 to the New Jersey Lawyers Fund For Client Protection in Trenton, New Jersey, and thereby reactivated my license to practice law in the State of New Jersey and Federal Court by way of the payment and a letter requesting my status be changed from "retired" to "active". My law license is now and has always been completely clean.]
Last Edited: Nov.13.2008
UPDATE: 1:31 PM
Its important that letters are still forwarded to his Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas as well as Chief Justice Roberts and the rest of the Court. Now that the Docket reflects that my case has followed proper procedure through all possible lower court jurisdictions, I will resubmit the application for an emergency stay of the national election to Justice Clarence Thomas.
Supreme Court Rule 22(4) (operating in tandem with Rule 23) gives me the right, by law, to resubmit the Application for Emergency Stay to “any other Justice” once the original stay application has been denied. According to the Docket, and a letter I received from Mr. Danny Bickell, Justice Souter denied the stay application on November 6th.
So, according to the Rules, I may now resubmit the application to “any other justice.”
SNIP
ded my renewed “application for an emergency stay” by interns in the Clerk’s office, even though, technically, according to Rule 22(1) the letter accompanying the application must be addressed to the “Clerk”. The Clerk is “William K Suter”.
Please send Mr. Suter letters indicating that you, as an American citizen, are outraged at the disrespect and sabotage this case, Donofrio v. Wells, US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407, has been subjected to. Mr. Suter’s address is:
William K. Suter, Clerk
United States Supreme Court
Office of the Clerk
Washington, D.C. 20543-0001
[Please dont' confuse Clerk Suter with Justice Souter.]
When you write your letters to; Justice Thomas, the other Supreme Court Justices, and Clerk Suter, it would be good to include a paragraph explaining that the case reflects a matter of vital public importance, depends on a genuine Constitutional issue of first impression, is coming directly from the NJ Supreme Court and is relying on the “stay application” precedent issued by the most Honorable Court in Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000):
“Governor Bush and Richard Cheney, Republican Candidates for the Presidency and Vice Presidency, filed an emergency application for a stay of this mandate. On December 9, we granted the application, treated the application as a petition for a writ of certiorari, and granted certiorari.”
SNIP
I did everything in my power to see that this was the case, and Mr. Bickell did everything in his power to see that this wasn’t the case.
And that’s why your letters are still needed. Mr. Bickell needs to understand that Justice Clarence Thomas and the rest of the Court will be aware that this case is on its way to them and that if anybody is going to deny the stay application – “We the People” – demand that it be a genuine US Supreme Court Justice and not a clerk impersonating a Justice.
UPDATE: 11:43 AM
Mr. Danny Bickell, stay clerk of the US Supreme Court, has finally corrected the Docket for US Supreme Court Case No. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells, to reflect that this case has come to the US Supreme Court directly from a final order denying emergency relief by the New Jersey Supreme Court. Having this case properly docketed is a major procedural necessity to the case having proper standing to be decided in the US Supreme Court.
Thanks to all who made a stand to see that this Docket was corrected.
US SUPREME COURT STAY CLERK DANNY BICKELL CONTINUES SABOTAGE OF NJ CITIZEN LAW SUIT CHALLENGING 08 ELECTION
As of 9:53 AM, November 13, 2008, the Docket for US Supreme Court case # 08A407 has still not been updated to reflect the fact that the case…
Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey
… now before the US Supreme Court comes directly from a final decision as to the emergency matter issued by the highest court in New Jersey which is the Supreme Court Of New Jersey. Mr. Bickell has consistently attempted to stop this case from being docketed properly. And in doing so Mr. Bickell has subverted and defiled the esteemed Rules of the US Supreme Court, particularly Rules 22 and 23.
MORE UPDATE 111208
7:28 PM: True to his form , but not to his word, US Supreme Court, Stay Clerk, Danny Bickell, has not updated the Docket to reflect that my case has come directly from a New Jersey Supreme Court order denying emergency relief. Mr. Bickell informed me that he has kept all reference to the NJ Supreme Court order off the Docket for the same reason he initially did not feed the Emergency Stay Application to Justice Souter back on Nov. 3rd, a semantical falsehood concocted by Mr. Bickell and/or his superiors.
SNIP
I am outraged and disgusted by Bickell’s cavalier piracy of my rights, of your rights, of our rights. And my passion for the law has never been greater than it is right now. I believe in law and order and that all stands must be made under the color of law.
It is time to make a stand for the law. For what is now being done to the law in the holiest legal stronghold this world had ever seen, The United States Supreme Court, is nothing short of a blatant attempt to strangle the last breath from our dying Constitutional system of Government created by the people and for the people. There is a force operating here with the intention of squeezing “we the people” out of the way. And that force is dead set against a single citizen setting a virtuous example for the entire nation to witness. Such audacity will apparently not be tolerated.
USA, your law is under attack tonight. Your entire system of Government is under attack with this case. My case is on sold legal ground and it belongs before the US Supreme Court based upon established State law precedent. No exception to standing need be crafted and there are no other procedural hang ups now standing in its way.
I have followed the law to get this case before the highest court in the land and the only thing stopping full review now is interference from a lowly clerk who is sticking it right in your face America. He’s basically telling all who are watching this sick play unfold that he holds the keys to the building and he will decide your rights, or lack thereof under the Document.
All we need to do is make enough noise so that Justice Thomas and the rest of the court knows that I am coming to the US Supreme Court with my proper papers.
All I can do is make my case public, show the documents, quote the law and keep you informed. Any noise you make must be of your own volition and of your own free will.
THERE IS NO NEED TO BREAK ANY LAW. PEACEFUL MEANS ARE THE ONLY MEANS BY WHICH THE LAW CAN BE UPHELD. BE HEARD BUT DONT GET IN TROUBLE. DONT BREAK THE LAW. ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT WE CAN’T KNOW WHO IS UNDER PRESSURE AND WHO IS APPLYING PRESSURE SO BE COOL BUT BE FIRM. TELL THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE.
More 2:10 PM 111208
Please write to Justice Thomas or any of the other justices. They must not allow a clerk to run the clock out on Mr. Donofrio’s case.
IMPORTANT UPDATE FROM MR DONOFRIO:
Dear Citizens of the United States of America,
I need your help and the US needs your help.
My case, LEO C. DONOFRIO v. NINA MITCHELL WELLS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY - US Supreme Court Docket # 08A407 - continues to be subjected to misconduct by the US Supreme Court Clerk’s office, particularly by Mr. Danny Bickell, the Stay Clerk.
SNIP
I call on all US citizens today to call both the Clerk’s office and the Public affairs office and to complain about the way this case has been handled. Please call them.
US Supreme Court Clerk’s Office – 202-479-3011US Supreme Court, Public Information Office – 202-479-3211
More important though, is the necessity that Justice Clarence Thomas and the rest of the Supreme Court receive direct mail letters (not e mail) bringing this case Docket # and the URL of my blog to their attention. You may write to Justice Thomas at the following address:
The Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
United States Supreme Court
One First Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20543.
Please include the docket # 08A407, and a link to this blog
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
If you write to Chief Justice Roberts, please make sure the envelope is addressed to
THE HONORABLE JOHN G. ROBERTS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES
Thank you,
Leo C. Donofrio
Yep, another one. Obama certificate is not the main issue. Read on.
Questions about that darned birth POTUS eligibility.
You are either “born” one or you are not, and if you are not, you cannot be POTUS.
The 14th Amendment can make one a “citizen” but not a “natural born citizen.”
From Citizen Wells:
On October 27, 2008, plaintiff-appellant, Leo Donofrio, a retired attorney acting Pro Se, sued Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, demanding the Secretary execute her statutory and Constitutional duties to police the security of ballots in New Jersey from fraudulent candidates ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States due to their not being “natural born citizens” as enumerated in Article 1, Section 2, of the US Constitution.
Donofrio v. Wells, having come directly from NJ state courts, will require the SCOTUS to apply New Jersey law, and New Jersey has a liberal history of according standing to citizens seeking judicial review of State activity.”
Atleast, he has standing to ask. I like the simplicity that Mr. Leo C Donofiro’s takes. Unlike Berg’s case, the main issue is whether Obama was a natural born citizen at “birth.” Note: he had dual nationality at birth subject to jurisdiction of Kenya and USA. (Dad was a Kenyan national, unless he was Malcom X.) Obama sure looks like Malcom X.
Hence, the statement:
If Mr. Obama wasn’t a natural born citizen “at birth” he can never satisfy the requirement.
The final conclusion in my SCOTUS stay application was as follows:
Appellant respectfully submits to this Honorable Court that while the limitations of our Constitution may at times appear unfair, it is important to remember that it is the restrictions which hold us to the Document, as much as it is the freedoms that bind us together as a nation.
Love that together binding statement.
STANDING
As a New Jersey citizen, I have proper standing. In fact, my standing wasn’t challenged by the NJ Attorney General’s office in their reply brief in defense of the Secretary of State, nor was my standing challenged by Judge Sabatino in his five page opinion from the NJ Appellate Division.
Remember this one?
“When the state legislature vests the right to vote for President in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental; and one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter.” Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S 5, 6 (2000)
SNIP
While Mr. Berg, who has made a valiant effort, does not have legal standing, I do have a right of review by the US Supreme Court since New Jersey recognizes my standing and also because I have exhausted all of my state court options and there is nowhere else for me to go for justice.
Due to the impending Electoral College meeting, a genuine emergency exists and the case must be resolved by the US Supreme Court, and it will be resolved by the Supreme Court unless the SCOTUS Clerk’s office interferes once again with the next phase of this litigation, that being my letter to Justice Clarence Thomas which is attached to my renewed application for an Emergency Stay of the 2008 national election.
Later today, I will release my letter to Justice Thomas as a sworn certification detailing the various unorthodox judicial activity my case has suffered. The case is officially named, “Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey”.
More PRLog
and Count Us OUT
November 11, 2008 at 10:30 PM
[...] this court recognize his standing. While Mr. Berg, who has made a valiant effort, does not have .. View post Add your [...]
November 12, 2008 at 2:51 AM
I have no doubt that the FBI, SS, NSA, and CIA know what the truth is about Obama’s citizenship and probably more about his associations than we’ll ever know. In one sense, I hope he is a natural-born citizen because if he is not, and no agency with that knowledge speaks out, who exactly can we depend on to protect this country and its constitution?
November 12, 2008 at 3:09 AM
Well, I don’t even know where to go on this one. I am a bit concerned about this lawsuit as it is different from Bergs. This man has standing because of how it was filed.
Whether he was born her or not, the problem is that dual citizenship.
November 12, 2008 at 3:52 AM
I had forgotten the dual citizenship thing. I also wondered if his stepfather adopted him, when did Barry Soetoro legally become Barak Obama again.
November 12, 2008 at 4:10 AM
wac no one knows…we are only guessing. He won’t release that information.
November 12, 2008 at 7:17 AM
[...] November 12, 2008 · No Comments The blogs are alive once again in the neverending saga on eligibility for the office of the President of the United States. A fascinating look at the current lawsuit on this particular topic. No swiss cheese pocked with holes either. And this is not about a birth certificate. Cross posted from McNorman, Leo C Donofrio And That Pesky Obama Birth Eligibility Question. [...]
November 12, 2008 at 8:29 PM
I called and the clerk said that it was denied by Justice Souter 11/6
November 12, 2008 at 9:07 PM
vrajavala,
Go to Leo Donofrio’s blog at http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
It details how the Souter denial did not legally occur and where the case currently stands
November 12, 2008 at 9:43 PM
well actually I did several birth charts, one for Honolulu, Vancouver B.C. and one for Kenya. As you can imagine, because each place is a different GMT, the Moon would be at a different degree for each place,,if we assume that the birth time of 7:24 PM is correct. The question is where? Susan Blake, a H.S. friend of Stanley Anne’s has a video on youtube where she talks about stanley being in Mercer Island the 3rd week of August 61. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d7PQJdKMGM
Also there are verified attendance college records of her from the university of Washington for Fall 61, etc. from the registrar.
Now, according to Vedic astrology the 360 degrees is divided into Nakshatras and they are further subdivided into “padas” consisting of 3 degrees and 20 minutes each. According to scripture, a native born into each varying “pada” has certain qualities and characteristics. That is how I did a rectification for him. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr1GhSvuGcs
Others from Kenya have said that stanley came with Obama Sr. to visit and went swimming in Mombasa and that inadvertantly set off labor. The airport officials refused to let her board a flight home. Obama was born in Mombasa and when Stanley finally went to Hawaii, obtained a COLB, which is different from a birth certificate.
The pada he would have been born in, Krtikkaa 2nd pada indicates he would be “an instigator” the one for Hawaii Rohini 1st pada would indicate “impolite speech”
November 12, 2008 at 9:46 PM
Krtikka 2nd pada would be the one for the Kenyan birth
November 12, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Thank you William…I just updated Donofrio’s information.
November 12, 2008 at 10:06 PM
I wrote a letter to Justice thomas
You might want to go here to ask for the support of this radio host.
http://www.patriotbrigaderadio.com/livejava.php
November 12, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Thank you vrajavala.
November 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM
[...] bookmarks tagged pesky Leo C Donofrio And That Pesky Obama Birth Eligibil… saved by 3 others xnooneknowsmex bookmarked on 11/18/08 | [...]
November 20, 2008 at 2:22 AM
[...] November 8, 2008 SCOTUS, Souter, Obama, Berg and the birth certificate Posted by mcnorman under Uncategorized | Tags: berg, Birth certificate, Obama | Be sure to look at Donofrio’s lawsuit. [...]
November 21, 2008 at 2:23 PM
How is it that this conference is a private affair? I thought court proceedings, especially from SCOTUS we public record, at the very least after the fact.
November 21, 2008 at 2:46 PM
ahrcanum: the conference is not a court proceeding according to SCOTUS. If 4 of the 5 want to hear the case, then they proceed.
November 22, 2008 at 11:18 PM
Disagree, J. Souter has on his own discretion is going to hear the case Berg v. Obama et al.
Both cases, and the others are RELEVANT. Lawyers have egos. They think only their case has perfect standing. I am a lawyer. Berg case has standing b/c it is based on a federal question against one of the candidates.
It is not about being bi-partisan in your pursuit. It is about whether you believe you can prove an issue that is of federal importance arising under the U.S. Constitution. Both cases present issues dealing with many that have occurred with this 2008 presidential election.
Both appear to be headed to the S.Ct. for hearings and responses to have the justices render an opinion.
Keep up the good work. From a fellow lawyer that practices in MO and the federal courts in MO.
November 23, 2008 at 2:47 AM
Issues: Thanks for your thoughts. I believe that simple questions must be answered. I feel that the issues at hand are critical to the future of our country.
Perhaps I am naive, but this country fought like hell to sever itself from foreign bodies that would dictate to the American people.
I do hope these cases are heard. I want to believe that truth still matters.
December 9, 2008 at 3:09 AM
Issues said: “I am a lawyer. Berg case has standing b/c it is based on a federal question against one of the candidates.”
If you were a lawyer, you should know this isn’t true. Read Judge Surrick’s order in Berg v Obama et al. for remedial instruction.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/28/.
December 9, 2008 at 3:13 AM
Kevin we will all see who has standing at some point in time.