$100 million is a lot this week. $8 billion is less?

Note Tapper’s follow-up about how Gibbs, just weeks ago, found the idea of $8 billion in earmarks — 80 times the size of this budget cut — “minuscule” in the context of the appropriations bill.

New $ math problem.

I don’t get Obama math.

Correct me if I am wrong, but aren’t these microscopic spending cuts?

Where’s the beef?

Rather than pretend to care about spending, the president could just double down, and call all those extra conferences “stimulus” spending. Of course, that would be cynical.

Hey, let’s not play dumb Mr Gibbs.  Flashback.

Remember when Obama, the junior Senator requested $860,000,000 in earmarks?

$100,000,000 in cuts?

He considered that small chump change as a junior Senator from Illinois.

Advertisement